Structure and valuation of intangible assets at different levels of standardization
Анотація
Introduction. Today, due to the large number of types of intangible assets that are presented in the valuation and accounting standards of different levels, it is difficult to determine their objective assessments.
Purpose. The article is devoted to the research and systematization of IA objects, presented in the international, European and national standards of expert assessment and accounting, with the aim to find the ways of domestic standards improvement, as well as management of IA at the enterprise.
Results. The structure of the IA objects, which are described in the International Standard for Assessments 210 “Intangible Assets”, the European Standards for Evaluation of the TEGoVA, the Professional Standards for the Evaluation of RICS, the National Standard No. 4 “Appraisal of Intellectual Property Rights”, the International Accounting Standard 38, Intangible Assets, and the Standards of Accounting 8 “Intangible Assets”, is analyzed. It is established that the objects of IA are shown in the international and national accounting standards, which are reflected in the accounting and financial statements of the entity, but they do not fully cover the market value of the enterprise. The list of objects of IA, which is not given in P (C) BO 8, is marked out and described, and accordingly they are not reflected in the financial statements of the enterprise. The article proposes a list of IA, which was formed on the basis of study of the nternational, European and national standards of expert assessment and can be taken into account by the enterprise for the estimation of business value and needs of IAmanagement.
Conclusions. It is noted that the assessment of IA is not a sufficiently developed direction of professional property valuation; therefore, there is a need to mprove the National Standard 4 “Appraisal of Intellectual Property Rights” from its approximation to international practice. It has been determined that a standard for the assessment of IA, which will regulate not only the evaluation of intellectual property objects, but also other IA objects, which will be used in international practice, taking into account contemporary economic development, will be developed. The results of this article outlined the directions of further research in the area of improving the methodology of IA assessment.
Ключові слова
Повний текст:
>PDF
Посилання
International Valuation Standards 2017. Available at: http://www.cas.org.cn/docs/2017-01/20170120142445588690.pdf.
European Valuation Standards TEGoVA 2003. Guidance Note 8 “Valuations of Intangible Assets”. Available at: http://www.tegova.org.
RICS Valuation – Global Standards 2017. Available at: https://www.roger-hannah.co.uk/uploads/red%20book-170725-023901.pdf.
Pro zatverdzhennya Natsionalʹnoho standartu № 4 “Otsinka maynovykh prav intelektualnoyi vlasnosti”. Zatverdzheno Postanovoiu Kabinety Ministriv Ukrainy vid 3.10.2007 r. №1185. [On approval of National standard No. 4 “Appraisal of intellectual property rights”]. (2007, October, 3). Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1185-2007.
Mizhnarodnyi standart bukhhalterskoho obliku 38 “Nematerialni aktyvy”: mizhnarodnyi document vid 01.01.2012 [International accounting Standard 38 intangible assets: International document]. (2012, January, 1). Available at: https://www.minfin.gov.ua/uploads/redactor/files/IAS%2038_ukr_2016.pdf.
Polozhennia (standart) bukhhalterskoho obliku 8 “Nematerialni aktyvy”. Zatverdzheno nakazom MFU vid 18.10.1999 r. № 242. [National accounting standard 8 Intangible assets]. (1999, October, 18). Available at: http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0750-99/.
Kolchar, Yu.O. (2014). Oblikova otsinka kliientskoi bazy yak nematerialnoho aktyvu bankivskykh ustanov [Accounting for the client base as an intangible asset of banking institutions]. (Thesis 08.00.09). Odesa: Odesa National Ekonomic University [in Ukrainian].
Hitchner, J. R., Rutgaizer, V. M. (Ed.). (2008). Otsenka stoimosti nematerialnykh aktivov [Valuation of intangible assets]. Moscow: Maroseika [in Russian].
Zadorozhnyi, Z. (2018). Problemni pytannia yakosti informatsii bukhhalterskoho i upravlinskoho obliku malotsinnykh aktyviv [Problematic issues relating to the quality of information used for accounting and management accounting of low-cost assets]. Visnyk Ternopilskoho natsionalnoho ekonomichnoho universytetu – Bulletin of Ternopil National Economic University, 115–124. (Vol. 1). [in Ukrainian].
Krupka, Ya. D., Zadorozhnyy, Z. V., & Melʹnyk, R. O. (2004). Bukhhalterskyi oblik v budivnytstvi [Accounting in construction]. Ternopil: PP “Prynter-inform” [in Ukrainian].
Butnik-Siverskyi, O. (2004). Teoretychni zasady intelektualnoi innovatsiynoi diialnosti na pidpryyemstvi [Theoretical foundations of intellectual innovation activity at the enterprise]. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukrain, 12, 31–37 [in Ukrainian].
Dyba, V. M. (2017). Oblik ta analiz nematerialnykh aktyviv v umovakh instytutsiinykh zmin: teoriia i metodolohiia [Accounting and analysis of intangible assets under institutional changes: theory and methodology]. (Thesis 08.00.09). Kyiv: [in Ukrainian].
Kouplend, T., Koller, T., & Murrin, D. (2005). Stoimost kompaniy: otsenka i upravleniie [Cost of companies: evaluation and management]. Moscow: Olímp – Biznes [in Russian].
Kutsyk, P. O., Drohobych, I. M., Plisa, Z. P., & Skop, H. I. (2016). Oblikova kontseptsiia upravlinnia vartistyu nematerialnykh aktyviv pidpryyemstva [Accounting concept of management of the value of intangible assets of the enterprise]. Lviv: Rastr-7 [in Ukrainian].
Puzynia, N. Yu. (2013). Otsenka i upravlenie nematerialnymi aktivamy kompanii [Evaluation and management of company’s intangible assets]. Saint Petersburg: SPb State Economic University [in Russian].
Fedulova, L. I. (2006). Metodichni aspekti otscinky intelektualnoho kapitalu kompanii [Methodological aspects of the assessment of the intellectual capital of companies]. Problemy nauky – Problems of Science, 9, 17–21 [in Ukrainian].
Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital: realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower. New York Harpercollins Publisers.
Sveiby, K. E. (2001). Methods of measuring intangible assets. Available at: https://www.sveiby.com/files/pdf/1537275071_methods-intangibleassets.pdf.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/sf2019.01.145
Посилання
- Поки немає зовнішніх посилань.
West Ukrainian National University