Systematization of the effects that arise in connection with the expansion of transnational bank capital
Анотація
Introduction. Openness to transnational financial flows is one of the most important indicators of the development of banking systems. The advocates of openness of banking systems for the entry of transnational banks as positive characteristics indicate increased competition in the banking sector, increased financial stability and efficiency, application of the newest management methods, diffusion of banking innovations, consolidation of both prudential standards and standards of regulation and supervision of banking activities. The purpose.
The purpose of the article is to study the signs of globalization of financial space and the main forms of the presence of foreign banks in the territory of the host country and identify a set of risks and effects arising from the expansion of transnational bank capital.
Results. The main consequences of the openness of banking systems for the expansion of transnational bank capital are investigated in the article. The main forms of the presence of foreign banks in the territory of the host country are identified, namely: representation of a foreign bank, a branch of a foreign bank, a bank with foreign participation and a subsidiary bank. The factors influencing the choice by a transnational bank of a certain organizational form of presence in foreign markets are determined. The differences in the behavior of branches of transnational banks and subsidiary banks in the financial markets of the host country are examined. A set of risks emerged in the case of the openness of the banking system and the presence of branches of transnational banks is identified. A set of effects generated by the expansion of transnational bank capital is investigated.
Conclusions. The removal of barriers to capital flows must be coordinated with certain measures in macroeconomic policy. Failure to comply with this condition can lead to crisis phenomena, growth of external debt, especially short-term, and threaten the financial stability of the state.
Ключові слова
Повний текст:
>PDFПосилання
Cerutti, E., Dell Ariccia, G., Martinez-Peria, M. S. (2007). How banks go abroad: branches or subsidiaries? Journal of Banking & Finance, 31, 1669–1692.
Fiechter, J., Ötker-Robe, I., Ilyina, A., Hsu, M., Santos, A., Surti, J. (2011). Subsidiaries or branches: does one size fit all? IMF Staff discussion note SDN/11/04. Available at : https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2011/sdn1104.pdf.
Fáykiss, P., Grosz, G., Szigel, G. (2013). Transforming subsidiaries into branches – should we be worrying about it? MNB Occasional Papers, 106. Budapest: Central Bank of Hungary.
Pontines, V., Siregar, R.Y. (2012). How should we bank with foreigners? An empirical assessment of lending behaviour of International Banks to six East Asian countries. ADBI Working Paper 386. Tokyo : Asian Development Bank Institute. Available at : https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/156241/ adbi-wp386.pdf.
Hoggarth, G., Hooley, J., Korniyenko, Ye. (2013). Which way do foreign branches sway? Evidence from the recent UK domestic credit cycle. Financial Stability Paper, 22. Available at : https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=2280385##.
Cetorelli, N., Goldberg, S. (2011). Liquidity management of US global banks: internal capital markets in the great recession. NBER Working Paper, 17355. Available at : https://www.newyorkfed.org/medialibrary/media/research/staff_reports/sr511.pdf.
Demidenko, M. V., Pelipas, I. V., Tochickaia, I. Je. (2016). Liberalizacija finansovogo rynka Respubliki Belarus v ramkah EAJeS [Liberalization of the financial market of the Republic of Belarus within the framework of the Euro-Asian Economic Union]. Sankt-Peterburg [in Russian].
Masson, P., Musa, M. (1995). The role of the IMF: financing and its interactions with adjustment and surveliance. Pamphlet Series No. 50. Washington: International Monetary Fund.
Kaminsky, G. L., Reinhart, C. M. (2000). On crises, contagion, and confusion. Journal of International Economics, 51 (1), 145-168.
IMF (2015). The IMF’s approach to capital account liberalization: revisiting the 2005 IEO evaluation. Available at : https://www.imf.org/ieo/pages/EvaluationImages232.aspx.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/sf2018.03.080
Посилання
- Поки немає зовнішніх посилань.
West Ukrainian National University