DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODERN THEORY OF ANALYSIS AND ITS SPECIFICITY
Анотація
Introduction. The new challenges of the modern economy, which arose as a result of the martial law and must be taken into account in the process of conducting analysis at all levels of managerial activity of economic entities, encourage the use of new tools and methods of assessment and preparation of information for management and require a rethinking of scientific approaches to synergism and complexity of this process.
The purpose of the article is to conduct in-depth studies of the theoretical foundations of economic analysis, to identify the key reasons for the emergence of its modern types, to highlight and critically evaluate its characteristics and directions for the formation of proposals regarding directions for the further development of this management function, taking into account current challenges and risks.
Results. In the process of the conducted scientific research, the types of economic analysis were identified, which will allow to determine the direction of the research taking into account all the necessary components. It is proposed to carry out the distribution of economic analysis according to the scope of its application, which will allow to precisely determine which analysis should be carried out in accordance with the management tasks of the economic entity. The main prospective types of economic analysis that correspond to modern challenges and risks and determine the possibilities of development of subjects in a competitive market environment are substantiated. It is proposed to carry out regulatory and legal analysis and computer analysis in the course of the business entity's activity, which will allow to fully reflect the quality of work of all levels of management and make it possible to choose the most effective direction for the further development of the business entity in the long term.
Prospects. The modern development of the economic system and the threats that arise in the process of managerial activity of business entities require analysts to quickly process economic data and derive their results in accordance with the specified terms. And therefore, the subject of further scientific research is the use of the capabilities of computer technologies in the process of conducting effective and qualitative analysis for the purposes of managing a business entity in order to solve problem situations.
Ключові слова
Повний текст:
>PDF
Посилання
Boichyk, I., Spiak, H., Khorunzhak, N. (2019). Obgruntuvannia indykatoriv i formalizatsiia intehralnoho pokaznyka stratehichnoho analizu pidpryiemstv [Justification of indicators and formalization of the integral indicator of strategic analysis of enterprises]. Modern Economics, 17, 239–243. Available at: http://dspace.wunu.edu.ua/bіtstream/pdf.
Herasymenko, T. O., Medvid, L. H., Ponomarenko, M. V. (2022). Rozvytok ekonomichnoho analizu u konteksti formuvannia yoho novoi paradyhmy [The development of economic analysis in the context of the formation of its new paradigm]. Visnyk Lvivskoho torhovelno-ekonomichnoho universytetu – Bulletin of the Lviv University of Trade and Economics, 69, 48–52 [in Ukrainian].
Izmailov, Ya. O. (2016). Rozvytok metodolohii ekonomichnoho analizu hospodarskoi diialnosti pidpryiemstv u postindustrialnii ekonomitsi [Development of the methodology of economic analysis of economic activity of enterprises in the post-industrial economy]. Problemy ekonomiky – Problems of Economy, 3. Available at: https://www.problecon.com/export_pdf/problems-ofeconomy-2016-3_0-pages-165_174.pdf.
Mnykh, Ye. V. (2006). Suchasnyi ekonomichnyi analiz: pytannia metodolohii ta orhanizatsii [Modern economic analysis: issues of methodology and organization]. Bukhhalterskyi oblik ta audyt – Accounting and Auditing, 1, 55–61 [in Ukrainian].
Novichenko, L. (2022). Orhanizatsiia ekonomichnoho analizu na pidpryiemstvi [Organization of economic analysis at the enterprise]. Ekonomi chnyi analiz – Economic Analysis, 1, 199–207 [in Ukrainian].
Oliinychuk, O. I. (2015). Systema analizu v upravlinni pidpryiemstvom, spriamovanomu na dosiahnennia ekonomichnoi bezpeky [System of analysis in enterprise management aimed at achieving economic security]. Efektyvna ekonomika – Efficient Economy, 6. Available at: http://www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=4156.
Parasii-Verhunenko, I. M. (2011). Evoliutsiia rozvytku ekonomichnoho analizu v stratehichnooriientovanii systemi upravlinnia [The evolution of the development of economic analysis in a strategically oriented management system]. Finansy, oblik i audyt – Finance, Accounting and Auditing, 18, 328–335 [in Ukrainian].
Raikovka, I. T. (2008). Ekonomichnyi analiz v systemi upravlinnia subiekta hospodariuvannia [Economic analysis in the management system of the business entity]. Visnyk Zhytomyrskoho derzhavnoho tekhnolohichnoho universytetu – Bulletin of the Zhytomyr State University of Technology, 2, 133–145 [in Ukrainian].
Synkevych, N., Krauze, O. (2022). Ekonomichnyi analiz: perspektyvy rozvytku v umovakh didzhytalizatsii ekonomiky [Economic analysis: prospects for development in the conditions of digitalization of the economy]. Halytskyi ekonomichnyi visnyk – Galician Economic Bulletin, 2, 7–15. Available at: https://doi.org/10.33108/galicianvisnyk_tntu2023.02.007.
Shkaraban, S. I. (2002). Mistse operatyvnoho ekonomichnoho analizu v pidhotovtsi spetsialistiv v sferi ekonomiky [The place of operational economic analysis in the training of specialists in the field of economics]. Problemy formuvannia rynkovoi ekonomiky – Problems of Formation of Market Economy, 571–577 [in Ukrainian].
Shesterniak, M. M. (2018). Suchasnyi ekonomichnyi analiz ta yoho osnovni vydy [Modern economic analysis and its main types]. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu – Scientific Bulletin of the Uzhhorod National University, 20(3), 158–162 [in Ukrainian].
Daniel, Е., Daniel, Р. (2019). Megaprojects as complex adaptive systems: the Hinkley point C case. International Journal of Project Management, 37, 1017–1033.
Khedhaouria, А., Cucchi, А. (2019). Technostress creators, personality traits, and job burnout: a fuzzy-set configurational analysis. Journal of Business Research, 101, 349–361.
Paola, N. Di. (2021). Pathways to academic entrepreneurship: the determinants of female scholars’ entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Technolоgy Transfer, 46, 1417–1441.
Papatheodorou, А., Pappas, N. (2017). Economic recession, job vulnerability, and tourism decision making: a qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Travel Research, 56, 663–677.
Pappas, І., Woodside, А. (2021). Fuzzyset Qualitative Comparative Analysis (fsQCA): guidelines for research practice information systems and marketing. International Journal of Information Management, 58. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0268401221000037?via%3Dihu.
Reschke, H., Bögenhold, D., Kraus, S. (2010). How innovation and entrepreneurship can conquer uncertainty and complexity: learning about the unexpected. International Journal of Complexity in Leadership and Management, 1, 55–71.
Schneider, М., Somers, М. (2006). Organizations as complex adaptive systems: implications of complexity theory for leadership research. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 351–365.
Tapsell, Р., Woods, С. (2010). Social entrepreneurship and innovation: self-organization in an indigenous context. Entrepreneurship Regional Development, 22, 535–556.
Uhl-Bien, М., Marion, R., McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. Leadership Quarterly, 18, 298–318.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/sf2024.02.116
Посилання
- Поки немає зовнішніх посилань.
West Ukrainian National University