Ecological component ofsustainable development: from theoryes to implementation
Анотація
Introduction. The article deals with the problem of ecologization of economic progress in a context of sustainable development. Different approaches of Kuznetz ecological curve focused on political, income and inequality factors are discussed. The key concepts of climate changings and impact of welfare indicators are analyzed. The key international initiatives of ecologization are discussed (Kyoto protocol, Copenhagen and Paris agreements).
Purpose. The purpose of the paper is generalization of key approaches of economic development ecologization and identification the conducive trends of international climate initiatives.
Results. The appearance of the welfare paradox in the process of economic development and ecologization interaction is substantiated. Main features of ecological racism as inequality in external environmental conditions which leads to deterioration of the health of people belonging to different races are considered. The results of the survey in several communities of Ternopil, Kyiv, Sumy, Donetsk, Zaporizhia, Poltava regions showed that 88% of Ukrainians believe that there is a threat of a global environmental crisis. Ukrainians consider that the most significant factors of the ecological crisis are transport (41% of respondents), industry (32%), financial and industrial groups (14%), increase in population (5%), increase of natural anomalies (5%), thermal stations (3%). 47% of respondents are ready to invest in reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Conclusions. The formation of new model of national economies ecologization in the context of welfare provision is actual today because there are lack of effective operational concepts and there are new challenges: climate change, population aging, environmental and public finance crises, new requirements for the quality and quantity of public goods, etc.
Ключові слова
Повний текст:
>PDF
Посилання
United Nations ESCAP. Available at: https:// www.unescap.org.
Wursthorn, S., Poganietz, W.R., Schebek, L. (2011). Economic-environmental monitoring indicators for European countries: a disaggregated sector-based approach for monitoring eco-efficiency. Ecological Economics, 70, 487-496.
Bailey, D. (2015). The Environmental paradox of the welfare state : the dynamics of sustainability. NewPolitical Economy, 20 (6).
Growth isn’t possible : NEF. Available at: https://www.neweconomics.org.
Helm, D. (2009). Environmental challenges in a warming world: consumption, costs and responsibilities. TannerLecture (2009, February, 21). NewCollege, Oxford, UK.
Bullard, R. D. (1990). Dumping in dixie: race, class and environmental quality. Boulder : Westview.
Blum, B. (1978). Cities: an environmental wilderness. Washington D. C.
Chavis, B. F. (1994). Unequal protection: environmental justice and communities of color. San Francisco : Sierra club books.
Grossman, G. M., Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impact of a North American free trade agreement. NBER Working Paper, 3914.
Mihalyschev, S. G., Ruskina, Y. V. (2016). Ekologicheskaya krivaya Kuznetsa: sluchay Rossii [Ecological Kuztetz curve: Russia’s case] Finansyi і biznes - Finance and business, 1,17-39 [in Russian],
Druzhinin, P. V., Shkiperova, G. T. (2012). Vliyanie razvitiya ekonomiki na okruzhayuscuyu sredu [Impuct of economic development on environment] Trudyi Karelskogo nauchnogo tsentra RAN - Herald of Caret scientific center RSA, 6, 106-114 [in Russian],
Panayotou, T. (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation and different stages of economic development. Working paperof ILO, 238.
Panayotou, T. (2003). Economic growth and the environment // Spring Seminar of the UN Economic commission forEurope (March, 3). Geneva.
Shibayama, K., Fraser, I. (2014). Non-homothetic growth models for the environmental Kuznets curve. International economic review, 55 (3), 919-942.
Lopez, R. (1994). The environment as a factor of production: the effects of economic growth and trade : liberalization. Ecological Economics, 27, 163-184.
Magnani, E. (2000). The environmental Kuznetz curve, environmental protection policy and Income distribution. Ecological economics, 32, 431-443.
Vornovytskyy, M., Boyse, J. (2010). Economic inequality and environmental quality: evidence of pollution shifting in Russia. Working paper series, 217.
Koop, G., Tole, L. (2001). Deforestation, distribution and development//Global environmental change, 11, 193-202.
de Soto H. (2001). The mystery of capital: why capitalism triumphs in the West and fails everywhere else. London: Black Swan.
Ravallion, M., Hell, M., Jyotsna, J. (2000). Carbon emission and income inequality. Oxford economicpapers, 52 (4), 651-669.
He, J., Makdissi, P., Wodon, Q. (2007). Corruption, inequality and environmental regulation. Workingpaper, 7(13).
Galeotti, M., Lanza, A., Pauli, F. (2006). Reassessing the environmental Kuznetz curve for C02 emissions: a Robustness exercise // Ecologi-caleconomics, 57, 152-163.
Haidutskyi, I. P (2014). Investuvannia nyz-kovuhletsevoi ekonomiky: teoriia, metodolohiia, praktyka [Investing in low-carbon economy : theory, methodology, practice], Kyiv[in Ukrainian],
The EU emissions trading system (EU ETS) Available at : https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies.
Do 2100 roku Zemlia nahriietsia bilshe, nizh peredbachaei Kopenhahenska uhoda [By 2100 the Earth will heat up more than the Copenhagen agreement provides]. Available at : https://cikavo.com.ua/ do-2100-roku-zemlya-nahrijetsya.html.
Agibalov, S., Kokorin, A. (2010). Kopenga-genskoe soglashenie - novaya paradigma resheni-ya klimaticheskoy problemy [Copenhagen Agreement - new paradigm of climate problem solving], Voprosy ekonomiki - Cuestions of Econimics, 9, 115-132[in Russian],
Ukrainska klimatychna meresha [Ukrainian climate network]. Available at: http://climategroup. org.ua.
U nimetskomu Bonni zavershylasia klimatychna konferentsiia OON [The Climate conference of the UN has ended in the German city Bonn], Available at : https://ecology.unian.ua/ecologyclimate.
Paris agreement. Available at : http://un-fccc.int/files/meetings/paris_nov_2015.
Pidcock, R. Analysis : what global emission in 2016 mean for climate change goals. Available at: https://www.carbonbrief.org/what-global-co2-emissions-2016-mean-climate-change.
Le Siège, C. et al. (2016). Global Carbon Budget 2016 Available at : https://www.earth-syst-sci-data.net/8/1/2016.
Simms, A. (2013). Cancel the apocalypse: The new path to prosperity. London: Hachette Digital.
Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptations and vulnerability. Available at: https://www. ipcc-wg2.gov.
Transforming our world : the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Available at : https:// documents.un.org/prod/ods.nsf/home.xsp.
Sustainable development goals: Ukraine: 2017 National Baseline Report.
Ukraina 2030: doktryna zbalansovanoho rozvytku [Ukraine 2030: Doctrine of sustainable development], (2017). Lviv : Calvaria[in Ukrainian],
Kroeger, T., Casey F. (2007). An assessment of market-based approaches to providing ecosystem services on agricultural lands. Ecological economics, 2, 321-332.
Dallimer, M., Irvine, K.N., Skiner, A.M. J., Davies, Z.G., Rouquette, J.R., Maltby, L.L., Warren, PH., Armsworth, PR., Gaston, K.J. (2012). Biodiversity and the feel-good factor: understanding associations between self-reported human well-being and species richness. BioScience, 47-55.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.35774/sf2017.04.007
Посилання
- Поки немає зовнішніх посилань.
West Ukrainian National University